<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Content Writing Advice, Blogs Vs Brochures</title>
	<atom:link href="http://footinmouthdisease.net/2009/01/26/content-writing-advice-blogs-vs-brochures/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://footinmouthdisease.net/2009/01/26/content-writing-advice-blogs-vs-brochures/</link>
	<description>Providing Local Search Engine Marketing, Content Writing Advice,Marketing Consulting  in Pomona and Claremont</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:32:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sara</title>
		<link>http://footinmouthdisease.net/2009/01/26/content-writing-advice-blogs-vs-brochures/#comment-367</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sara]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://footinmouthdisease.net/?p=298#comment-367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don&#039;t know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.

Sarah

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don&#8217;t know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.</p>
<p>Sarah</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Piper</title>
		<link>http://footinmouthdisease.net/2009/01/26/content-writing-advice-blogs-vs-brochures/#comment-332</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy Piper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 01:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://footinmouthdisease.net/?p=298#comment-332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A good content management system - that is not a blog site can function to develop rankings for long and short tail keywords,   It seems that a good blog site with some static content is the best way to go these days/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good content management system &#8211; that is not a blog site can function to develop rankings for long and short tail keywords,   It seems that a good blog site with some static content is the best way to go these days/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeremypenguin</title>
		<link>http://footinmouthdisease.net/2009/01/26/content-writing-advice-blogs-vs-brochures/#comment-331</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jeremypenguin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 21:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://footinmouthdisease.net/?p=298#comment-331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Pat

I agree that an important point about your sales copy - whether you call it a brochure or not -  is that it does need to call the visitor into action, and writing in a purely informative style may prevent you from converting clients. So while the tone is usually a bit more formal in your sales copy, vs a blog post, I would say it still needs to be able to connect, and not just provide info.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Pat</p>
<p>I agree that an important point about your sales copy &#8211; whether you call it a brochure or not &#8211;  is that it does need to call the visitor into action, and writing in a purely informative style may prevent you from converting clients. So while the tone is usually a bit more formal in your sales copy, vs a blog post, I would say it still needs to be able to connect, and not just provide info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Shaughnessy</title>
		<link>http://footinmouthdisease.net/2009/01/26/content-writing-advice-blogs-vs-brochures/#comment-330</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pat Shaughnessy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 21:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://footinmouthdisease.net/?p=298#comment-330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I enjoyed this article. Coming from the B2B world, I agree with the Brochure terminology.

One additional point about a brochure :
It is often written to be able to &quot;stand-alone&quot;, with no additional collateral needed to make the key selling points a for a perticular product.

I would drop the keyword density argument. Density does not matter in SEO as long as the terms are on the page. Keyword proximity on the other hand, I would pay attention to. 

You can also try to make brochures a bit more dynamic, which may help a bit with ranking. I would suggest allowing comments on brochures (this assumes a blog/CMS or some other mechanism to allow this). I you put in a call to action, you will get comments, questions and feedback. 
--thanks
pat]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed this article. Coming from the B2B world, I agree with the Brochure terminology.</p>
<p>One additional point about a brochure :<br />
It is often written to be able to &#8220;stand-alone&#8221;, with no additional collateral needed to make the key selling points a for a perticular product.</p>
<p>I would drop the keyword density argument. Density does not matter in SEO as long as the terms are on the page. Keyword proximity on the other hand, I would pay attention to. </p>
<p>You can also try to make brochures a bit more dynamic, which may help a bit with ranking. I would suggest allowing comments on brochures (this assumes a blog/CMS or some other mechanism to allow this). I you put in a call to action, you will get comments, questions and feedback.<br />
&#8211;thanks<br />
pat</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeremypenguin</title>
		<link>http://footinmouthdisease.net/2009/01/26/content-writing-advice-blogs-vs-brochures/#comment-329</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jeremypenguin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://footinmouthdisease.net/?p=298#comment-329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LOL]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill Whalen</title>
		<link>http://footinmouthdisease.net/2009/01/26/content-writing-advice-blogs-vs-brochures/#comment-328</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jill Whalen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://footinmouthdisease.net/?p=298#comment-328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t recall seeing anyone in the audience with their foot in their mouth...but it was a huge room ;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t recall seeing anyone in the audience with their foot in their mouth&#8230;but it was a huge room <img src='http://s1.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeremypenguin</title>
		<link>http://footinmouthdisease.net/2009/01/26/content-writing-advice-blogs-vs-brochures/#comment-327</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jeremypenguin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://footinmouthdisease.net/?p=298#comment-327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was sitting in on the SES New York 2008 Organic Search Panel
http://footinmouthdisease.net/2008/03/28/blogs-start-outpacing-static-sites-ses-new-york-organic-listings-panel/ where you were a panelist when we had brought up this topic previously. I agree that it&#039;s a topic that seems to get overlooked when it&#039;s very important for webmasters to remember.

I also agree with your point about having engaging content on the site, and not rely on brand recognition, as you may not actually have it :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was sitting in on the SES New York 2008 Organic Search Panel<br />
<a href="http://footinmouthdisease.net/2008/03/28/blogs-start-outpacing-static-sites-ses-new-york-organic-listings-panel/" rel="nofollow">http://footinmouthdisease.net/2008/03/28/blogs-start-outpacing-static-sites-ses-new-york-organic-listings-panel/</a> where you were a panelist when we had brought up this topic previously. I agree that it&#8217;s a topic that seems to get overlooked when it&#8217;s very important for webmasters to remember.</p>
<p>I also agree with your point about having engaging content on the site, and not rely on brand recognition, as you may not actually have it <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill Whalen</title>
		<link>http://footinmouthdisease.net/2009/01/26/content-writing-advice-blogs-vs-brochures/#comment-326</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jill Whalen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://footinmouthdisease.net/?p=298#comment-326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like this article, in general, as there seem to be so many in the SEO world who don&#039;t get the distinction between the two different types of writing and resulting SEO that goes with it.

To me, the main part of the site (which you&#039;re calling the brochure) is the absolute, most critical part of your site. Anything you do in addition to that is extra.

Like John Jones above, I also take issue to the word &quot;brochure&quot; as it is used here, however. I&#039;ve spent countless seminars trying to educate marketers that their website is absolutely NOT a brochure. 

To me the difference is that a brochure presumes the reader has already asked for your information and has some idea of who you are. On the web, and search engine traffic more specifically, it can be hit or miss. Those who type in your brand name obviously do know what they&#039;re looking for, but those who type in keywords may not know you exist. 

If you write your web pages like you might in a brochure, they may never get a good feel for who you are because you may not be writing descriptively enough. Online copywriting must be as descriptive as possible in order to tell your site visitors (and the search engines) exactly what the page in question is all about.

But all in all, very good article!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like this article, in general, as there seem to be so many in the SEO world who don&#8217;t get the distinction between the two different types of writing and resulting SEO that goes with it.</p>
<p>To me, the main part of the site (which you&#8217;re calling the brochure) is the absolute, most critical part of your site. Anything you do in addition to that is extra.</p>
<p>Like John Jones above, I also take issue to the word &#8220;brochure&#8221; as it is used here, however. I&#8217;ve spent countless seminars trying to educate marketers that their website is absolutely NOT a brochure. </p>
<p>To me the difference is that a brochure presumes the reader has already asked for your information and has some idea of who you are. On the web, and search engine traffic more specifically, it can be hit or miss. Those who type in your brand name obviously do know what they&#8217;re looking for, but those who type in keywords may not know you exist. </p>
<p>If you write your web pages like you might in a brochure, they may never get a good feel for who you are because you may not be writing descriptively enough. Online copywriting must be as descriptive as possible in order to tell your site visitors (and the search engines) exactly what the page in question is all about.</p>
<p>But all in all, very good article!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeremypenguin</title>
		<link>http://footinmouthdisease.net/2009/01/26/content-writing-advice-blogs-vs-brochures/#comment-325</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jeremypenguin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 16:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://footinmouthdisease.net/?p=298#comment-325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@john jones

FYI Updated tags and categories :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@john jones</p>
<p>FYI Updated tags and categories <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Jones</title>
		<link>http://footinmouthdisease.net/2009/01/26/content-writing-advice-blogs-vs-brochures/#comment-324</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Jones]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 16:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://footinmouthdisease.net/?p=298#comment-324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@jeremypenguin

&quot;... wonder where the saturation point is...&quot;

Regardless if you call SEO art or a science, your statement I quoted above is the reason I love doing what I do.  There is no absolute answer to that but instead only a handful... ok a truck load of opinions on the topic of keyword density or saturation.

I&#039;d personally trim out, &quot;Content on Google searches&quot; &amp; &quot;Content&quot; from your categories because one isn&#039;t entirely relevant and the other is easily assumed by the other categories.

I&#039;d also remove, &quot;Brochure writing&quot; (Do a Google search for my reasoning) from your tags.

Just opinions though; don&#039;t shoot me or make me walk home today.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@jeremypenguin</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230; wonder where the saturation point is&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Regardless if you call SEO art or a science, your statement I quoted above is the reason I love doing what I do.  There is no absolute answer to that but instead only a handful&#8230; ok a truck load of opinions on the topic of keyword density or saturation.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d personally trim out, &#8220;Content on Google searches&#8221; &amp; &#8220;Content&#8221; from your categories because one isn&#8217;t entirely relevant and the other is easily assumed by the other categories.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d also remove, &#8220;Brochure writing&#8221; (Do a Google search for my reasoning) from your tags.</p>
<p>Just opinions though; don&#8217;t shoot me or make me walk home today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

